You can find more information on the BOLD programme at Ministry of Justice: Better Outcomes through Linked Data ( BOLD). The statistical models described in previous sections ‘3.2 Linking probation and treatment data sets’ and ‘3.3 Pathways between probation and treatment’ showed that people were less likely to access treatment if the year they received their treatment requirement was the most recent one (2021 to 2022). It is possible that this is simply due to people from earlier years having a longer time to access treatment. For example, people who were sentenced in March 2022 would have had a limited amount of time to access treatment compared with those who were sentenced in March 2019. This experimental statistics publication is the first time DHSC and MOJ have collaborated by linking data to better understand how the pathway between probation and treatment services works. Our analysis shows that there are potential issues in this pathway that need to be resolved. These statistics could be useful to people who want to ensure that pathways between probation and treatment services are operating as intended.

DRR Meanings | What Does DRR Stand For? - All Acronyms

The probabilistic linkage process linked 15,891 offenders (40.9%) with at least one treatment record during this same period. There was an error rate of around 1 in 1,000, which means we are 99.9% confident that the records from the 2 separate systems correctly aligned. The results in this report are based on this probabilistic linkage approach. We will use data that helps us to identify the specific courts (and associated probation regions) that are sentencing offenders to an ATR or DRR. This will enable the project to see more clearly where the pathways between probation and treatment are working effectively or not. This is broken down as 8,065 offenders (45.9%) with an ATR who appear to have engaged in treatment on or after their sentence date, compared with 7,056 offenders (33.1%) with a DRR. Further detail for people already in treatment on or after their sentence date is available for the ATR and DRR groups in the data tables (tables 5 and 6). We use statistical models to measure whether or not any of the people’s characteristics, such as their age or ethnicity, are associated with accessing or completing treatment.

whether people were using the substances recorded on the TOP in the 28 days before starting treatment Looking at 3 weeks after the sentence date, 26% of offenders with an ATR were identified in treatment, compared with 20% of offenders with a DRR. When offenders sentenced to an ATR or a DRR enter treatment, they are categorised into one of the 4 substance groups depending on what substances they are having problems with. For offenders with an ATR, we show the changes captured on the TOP as being in the ‘alcohol only’ substance group. For offenders sentenced to a DRR, we show the changes captured on the TOP as being on the ‘opiate’ substance group. A discovery phase between October and December 2021 identified more than 50 knowledge gaps. Between January and March 2022, the programme entered a prioritisation and mobilisation phase to identify which knowledge gaps should be prioritised and to recruit a team to start the work. Full details of the outputs from this statistical model are available in the data tables (table 8).

Pathways between probation and addiction treatment in England

To seek the views of people who use treatment services to help improve and refine projects that we identified in our discovery phase. For more about this objective, see section ‘7.3 Engaging with stakeholders’ below.The information on housing, people, culture, employment and education that is displayed about Parc Erissey Industrial Estate, New Portreath Road, Redruth, TR16 4HZ is based on the last census performed in the UK in 2021. Given the sizeable minority of people who are already in treatment when they are sentenced, it would be helpful to know the date of their main offence. This will help analysts to determine more accurately when people start treatment, compared with the offence that triggered the sentence. Other community sentence requirements The substance misuse demonstrator pilot includes a project where MOJ and DHSC are working together to explore the pathway into treatment when people receive ATRs and DRRs at court. The main advantage of the probabilistic approach is its flexibility. In the deterministic approach, people in both data sets have to match exactly on initials, date of birth, sex, ethnicity and geography. But the probabilistic approach allows records to be linked if, for example, a person’s forename initial is recorded differently on different systems (such as when Anthony or ‘A’ is recorded on one system, but Tony or ‘T’ is recorded on the other).

DRR USA – G-FORCE POWERSPORTS DRR USA – G-FORCE POWERSPORTS

To do this qualitative research, the BOLD team commissioned Policy Lab to evaluate current service provision by speaking with probation staff and users of treatment services. Policy Lab will then co-design potential new solutions with our stakeholders. Policy Lab is a government team that works with other departments to bring people-centred design approaches to policy making. The model measures associations between these characteristics and the likelihood of being in treatment either on the date of sentencing or engaging in treatment after sentencing. The model produces adjusted odds ratios ( AOR). These ratios show how one characteristic compares with another, while adjusting for all other characteristics in the model. For example, women were around 10% less likely to be in treatment either on or after their sentencing date compared with men ( AOR 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.79 to 0.99)). The confidence interval is important because it shows the range of values within which we are 95% confident the true value lies. So, we are 95% confident women engage in treatment 1% to 21% less often than men. ATR characteristics associated with accessing treatment criminogenic characteristics (such as offence type, risk of serious reoffending and offender group reconviction scale ( OGRS), which is a predictor of reoffending based on age, sex and criminal history) Breaking the combined group down by treatment requirement, we found 29.2% of people with a DRR and 61.4% with an ATR completed their treatment successfully. These results indicate that offenders sentenced to an ATR or DRR who access treatment services are achieving slightly better outcomes than the general treatment population. 3.8 Characteristics associated with successfully completing treatment Characteristics associated with completing treatment

We present details on the records from nDelius and the overall rate of linkage (or detection) to the NDTMS data set. estimate whether people who engage in treatment (particularly those who complete treatment) achieve better reoffending outcomes The deterministic linkage process identified that 9,976 (25.7%) offenders sentenced between August 2018 and March 2022 had at least one treatment record during the same period. The probabilistic linkage approach improved this overall linkage rate.